Page 3 of 7

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:19 pm
by Iain
What was wrong with Phillipa?

em is ken's fishy friend better than a techno teaboy though?

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:02 pm
by gordon
iain wrote:What was wrong with Phillipa?
Nothing. She was very nice. *But* I'd rather be Scorelord or Lloyd any day.
iain wrote:em is ken's fishy friend better than a techno teaboy though?
That's the problem with my suggestions... I suppose Scorelord and Joystick Juggler would have to rank higher than Ken's Fishy Friend, Pantomime Horse, and Techno Teaboy... But *you* have the power to decide these things, Iain :) -- you can rank them as you see fit.

Thought of another one: Lloyd's Llapdog.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 9:31 pm
by Lloyd Mangram
Lloyd's lapdog! (woof!) :D
Personally, I though that Iain's other idea was pretty good, I mean stick to the zzapratings:
Gold Medal
Sizzler
Silver Medal
(Pastblaster, maybe?)
Tacky Award (lowest)
Or when you really want to degrade the 'new' members, add:
CU Screenstar, or C+VG hit! (this is, of course, lower than the Tacky Award :wink:

Whatever :)

Rob

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:08 pm
by gordon
Only 3 posts to go, BJ, and you'll have cracked 50! Give that man a biscuit!

btw, I agree with you: Gold Medal, etc is the way to go if Iain (and us) can think of enough...

g.

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:16 pm
by CraigGrannell
Why not just combine them:

Techno teaboy
Joystick juggler
Sizzler!
Gold Medal winner

etc?

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 10:30 am
by Lloyd Mangram
Who knows what I'll be next? :shock:
Only 5 to go...

(totally unnecessary posts inc.)

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 12:35 pm
by CraigGrannell
Well, the irony is that my current description is perfect, as that's what I do! :)

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 3:04 pm
by gordon
CraigGrannell wrote:Well, the irony is that my current description is perfect, as that's what I do! :)
Oooh, do you think they'll have "Lazy Fat Bastard" any time soon? Maybe at 200 posts... :)

g.

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 4:14 pm
by Mayhem
Guess we know now... Jim is a staffer ;)

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 4:37 pm
by Lloyd Mangram
Yes indeed!
And now, you bunch of lousy freelancers get back to work!
Were behind on schedule!
:D

(or perhaps I'm sounding a little too much like the 'Ed' now, something that I'll be after 1000 post, and after my divorce of course... :D )

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 4:40 pm
by CraigGrannell
biggestjim wrote:Yes indeed!
And now, you bunch of lousy freelancers get back to work!
Were behind on schedule!
Nice to see the tact machine on full here. Don't become an editor. Ever.

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 4:58 pm
by gordon
CraigGrannell wrote:
biggestjim wrote:Yes indeed!
And now, you bunch of lousy freelancers get back to work!
Were behind on schedule!
Nice to see the tact machine on full here. Don't become an editor. Ever.
Shit. I thought BJ was being too soft. It's no wonder I was fired... ;)

g.

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 5:47 pm
by Iain
ANd remember Jim, no more than 1.5p a word! And only if they are big long words!!!

Bloody slackers.

Em this thread has gone a tad off topic hasn't it?

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 7:02 pm
by CraigGrannell
gordon wrote:Shit. I thought BJ was being too soft. It's no wonder I was fired... ;)
Ah, but the times change. These days everyone's a bit more chilled out. Or maybe it's because I hit deadline about 95 per cent of the time... (More likely, I guess.)
iain wrote:ANd remember Jim, no more than 1.5p a word!
*Choke*
Em this thread has gone a tad off topic hasn't it?
Just wait until we start talking about pelicans. And origami.

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 10:06 pm
by Iain
and bananas!