Can the reveiw for Catalypse really be justified?
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 5:06 pm
A score in the 20's for a game that though not unbelievable was surely worth more...
Good graphics, nicely drawn sprites and smooth movement (imo),
Great sound and music (except for slightly dodgy speech),
Good challenge and lastability- not too easy - not too hard...
Certainly playable though missing the X factor.
A score in range of 70-80 maybe a fairer reflection on a half decent game?
(CF = 90% possibly not that good.. )
Do you think this game should have scored higher? If so, how high?
Was the review harsh or fair? (how can 2 mags be almost 70% apart?)
Good graphics, nicely drawn sprites and smooth movement (imo),
Great sound and music (except for slightly dodgy speech),
Good challenge and lastability- not too easy - not too hard...
Certainly playable though missing the X factor.
A score in range of 70-80 maybe a fairer reflection on a half decent game?
(CF = 90% possibly not that good.. )
Do you think this game should have scored higher? If so, how high?
Was the review harsh or fair? (how can 2 mags be almost 70% apart?)