Author
|
Topic: Can we have a Zzap error report page
|
jules |
posted 02-06-2001 12:33 AM GMT
Hello all, finally found this page.More issues on line as I always say "Keep it up!" Anyway, I have been attempting to check the issues, which is a slow progress. Have not found any errors yet, but with so many pages to check, so easy to miss something. Any chance of having a page on this site where known errors with issues can be shown. Even if a error is fixed, it should still be kept up on the list, so that people are aware that an error existed and can check to see if there zzaps are correct.
|
iain
|
posted 05-06-2001 03:33 PM GMT
A good idead, although so many errors have been reported over the past few months and fixed, that I couldn't remember them.It would be bad if incorrect scanned issues were being passsed around. Although I plan to have 100% correct issues burnt on CD and that will act as the definite source of issues with no errors.
|
Matt
|
posted 07-06-2001 11:18 AM GMT
I have just spotted an error in issue 68. The scans of page 65 and 68 are the same. It contains an article about Turrican II...Cheers, /Matt :) |
iain
|
posted 07-06-2001 01:17 PM GMT
oops I'll make sure Mort gets a severe whipping for that!
|
Mort
|
posted 07-06-2001 01:22 PM GMT
I`ll go on a go slow! :-)) |
Mayhem
|
posted 07-06-2001 01:38 PM GMT
Here's a Q for you Mort. Scanning a page at 600 dpi takes about 90 seconds on my machine/scanner. Is yours just quicker or do you have all the time in the world to do this scanning at the mo? :) |
Mort
|
posted 08-06-2001 02:12 PM GMT
I do a lot of exercise so I scan the issues in between regimes. ie scan pressups,scan situps etc. So I time my exercise by the scanner. It takes about the same time to scan on my 700mhz PIII with Umax scanner:-) |